Sunday, December 29, 2013
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Google Drive Tetrad
The rise of advanced and mobile technologies ushered the society in an era where laptops, notebooks, tablets, handheld and pocket-sized mini computers have become an integral part of individuals’ life (van Velsen, Beaujean, & van Gemert-Pijnen, 2013). Google provides software applications such as Google Drive, which replaces Google Docs. Like any other technologies, Google Drive follows McLuhan’ s tetrad of enhancement, obsolescence, retrieval, and reversal (Thornburg, 2008).
Indeed, as in the
displayed tetrad above, Google Drive enhances data storage, information
retrieval, and sharing of file and folders.
The Software Engineer Zach (2013) demonstrated ways to blog, share, and
retrieve files and folders via any device, using Google Drive (Sangani,
2012).
Indeed, software applications provide wide language support; however
using keyboard is sometime cumbersome and individuals might resort to handwriting
(Xiao, 2013).
Google Drive is a Web-based productivity software for cloud-based
storage services
such as Dropbox Sky
Drive, and sets up itself for cloud computing, in terms of reversal. Google Drive obsoletes hard drive, compact disc, diskette drive,
flash drive storage, and dropbox.
It rekindles the old way of storing data on floppy disc, which is hard
to find in the digital communication era.
The table of comparison below, provides information on free allowable space in gigabytes (GB on cloud storage. Thus, individuals might embrace cloud computing that encompasses Google Drive, for a comprehensive and collaborative medium to create, share, and edit documents, calendars, and social networking communities (Robertson, 2013).
The table of comparison below, provides information on free allowable space in gigabytes (GB on cloud storage. Thus, individuals might embrace cloud computing that encompasses Google Drive, for a comprehensive and collaborative medium to create, share, and edit documents, calendars, and social networking communities (Robertson, 2013).
References
Robertson, C.
(2013). Using a Cloud-based Computing Environment to Support Teacher Training
on Common Core Implementation. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice
To Improve Learning, 57(6), 57-60. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0702-9
Sangani, K. (2012). Google: Google drive. Engineering & Technology (17509637),
7(8), 101
Thornburg, D. D.
(2008). Emerging technologies and
McLuhan's Laws of Media. Lake
Barrington, IL: Thornburg Center for
Space Exploration.
van Velsen, L., Beaujean, D. A., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. C. (2013). Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 13(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-23
Xiao, X. (2013). Handwriting input comes to Gmail and Google Docs. Retrieved from http://googledrive.blogspot.com/2013/10/handwritingindocs.html
Xiao, X. (2013). Handwriting input comes to Gmail and Google Docs. Retrieved from http://googledrive.blogspot.com/2013/10/handwritingindocs.html
Zack, L.
(2013). New Google sheets: Faster, more powerful, and works offline. Retrieved from http://googledrive.blogspot.com
Sunday, December 8, 2013
EMERGING AND SUTURE TECHNOLOGIES
Identifying an Emerged Technology
Graphing CalculatorTI-84 Plus |
The TI-84-Plus graphing calculator serves as a motivational tool to students and its uses facilitate students’ mathematical computations and some problem solving techniques (Lyublinskaya & Tournaki, 2010), as TI E2ETM Community revealed and McLaughlin (2013) depicted in his blog. Blog
Dr. Steven McLaughlin |
The Center for Technology in Learning
TI-Navigator System |
Although some individuals had knowledge about innovations, they lack understanding and insight about the process of change, which drive successful change (Fullan, Cuttress, & Kilcher, 2005). Thus, rather than technology, people might constitute other barriers to the diffusion process, evoking lack of money. To diffuse any technological innovations in the mathematics classrooms, the scholar of change would think of students, and teachers’ perceptions on the attributes (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) of the innovation that influences its adoption and diffusion (Rogers, 2003), citing scholarly works and presenting the video below. The change agent might educate stakeholders on the uses of the new technology in terms of its applicability and reliability (Webster & Jeong-Bae, 2012), and be proactive in the decision-making.
References
Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2005). 8 forces for leaders of change. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 54-58,64. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/211518218?accountid=14872
Lyublinskaya, I. and N. Tournaki (2010). Integrating TI-Nspire technology into algebra classrooms: Selected factors that relate to quality of instruction Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference San Diego, CA, AACE.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
The Center for Technology in Learning SRI International. (2012). Algebra N-spired research study phase 2: Final report. Retrieved from http://education.ti.com/en/us/research/research_navigator/quantitative-studies
Thornburg, D. D. (2009). Current trends in educational technology. Lake Barrington, IL: Thornburg Center for Space Exploration.
Webster, T.E., & Jeong-Bae, S. (2012). Implementing proactive maintenance policies to address problems with access to technology at Korean universities. International Journal Of Pedagogies & Learning, 7(2), 109-121
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)